![]() There might be a chess player on here that doesn't speak, doesn't start threads or make comments, and hasn't joined clubs. That seems so ridiculous, now, doesn't it. Anyway, how would it work?Īre there these "computer accounts" with some random name that some guy edits, make them have friends, join clubs, start or comment threads, etc. If I took a random sampling of 100 members, would you accept it as proof?Īnd what about the moves? I mean sure, I ain't a great player, nor have I played thousands of games, but I sure as hell can tell the differences between computer and human players already. I am not implying that never uses computers to reduce matching time. That's a yes or no question for which you have the full power to say yes, no, maybe, I don't understand the question, and so on. I asked if you would accept a random sampling of 100 members as proof. it is totally possible that they *sometimes* do it so that people can get paired with opponents faster than other chess websites. You cannot prove that they *never* do it. " *never* reduces matching time using computers that appear to be human." You said " doesn't reduce matching time using computers that appear to be human." ![]() ![]() i only suggested that it is possible that they sometimes use computer opponents to pose as human opponents. I was not suggesting that there are no humans on. ![]() ![]() Would you accept a random sampling of 100 members as proof?ĭmxn2k: you're trying to put words in my mouth and it's not working. No, doesn't reduce matching time using computers that appear to be human. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |